Review: New Earth, by Ben Bova

Posted: October 7, 2013 in Book Reviews, Science Fiction, Writing
Tags: , , ,

9780765330185_p0_v2_s114x166

(New Earth, by Ben Bova, Tor, 2013, $24.99, 384 pp.)

reviewed by Zeke Teflon

“Novel, n. A short story padded . . .” –Ambrose Bierce, The Devil’s Dictionary

Perhaps the most annoying things in fiction are smart characters saying and doing dumb things, and failing to reach obvious conclusions. The only reason Ben Bova’s recent novel, New Earth, reaches nearly 400 pages is precisely because of these things.

The tale revolves around a small expedition sent to investigate an Earth-like planet orbiting Sirius–yes, Sirius. Current estimates place the age of Sirius at only 300 to 400 million years. It’s a bright, massive, spectral class A star emitting strongly in the ultraviolet, and it has a white dwarf companion orbiting it in a highly elliptical orbit; at periastron (the point at which an orbiting body is nearest to a star), the dwarf is only about eight astronomical units from Sirius (less than the distance of Saturn from the sun). This makes the existence of a planet in Sirius’ “Goldilocks zone” an impossibility. Then, there’s the matter of life arising on such a planet, let alone a full-blown, Earth-like ecosphere. On Earth, it took the better part of a billion years for the simplest one-celled organisms to arise, and the first plants and animals didn’t appear for nearly four billion years. One would think this would arouse strong suspicions on the part of the novel’s scientific establishment on Earth, and of the scientists sent to explore the new planet. That suspicion is there in the story, but it’s very muted.

Once at New Earth, the expedition discovers that the planet not only has a fully developed Earth-like ecosphere, but is inhabited by friendly humans, genetically indistinguishable from Earth humans, who tell them the carefully worded exact truth in reply to questions. This is the point at which New Earth becomes really irritating, because the expedition scientists fail to realize they’re receiving incomplete information, and fail (for months!) to ask even the most obvious follow-up questions. Then, more than halfway through the narrative, they are shocked, shocked to discover that the planet is artificial.

Beyond that, the characters, dialogue, and the story itself are all flat. The characters, including the primary character, Jordan, are ciphers; none of them have any complexity or passion. And most of the expedition members are little more than names attached to functions.

The dialogue is equally insipid. Conflict drives good dialogue, and there’s very little conflict in New Earth.

As for the story itself, the entire book revolves around the question of why New Earth is there. And it takes a remarkably long time to answer that question. The reason for the book’s length is that the supposedly smart expedition members act very stupidly for an agonizing number of pages.

To put this another way, New Earth isn’t a conflict-driven drama. Rather, it’s a puzzle piece. And while puzzles can work well as short stories, they rarely if ever work well as novels.

New Earth isn’t a terrible book. It’s just not much of a book. It’s a prime example of the bloated puzzle pieces sci-fi publishers all too often palm off as novels.

* * *

Zeke Teflon is the author of Free Radicals: A Novel of Utopia and Dystopia

Free Radicals: A Novel of Utopia and Dystopia cover

Enhanced by Zemanta
About these ads
Comments
  1. Joachim Boaz says:

    Ben Bova has never struck me as a “good” SF author. He’s routinely middling and when he’s bad he’s downright awful….

    Like

  2. I’d never read one of Bova’s novels before, and decided to give “New Earth” a try because the library had a copy, and the pickings there are slim. I generally have to buy sci-fi books by authors I like, as the librarian who orders sci-fi titles has terrible taste — heavy on the swords, sorcery, vampires, and trash sci-fi movies turned into books, and very light on hard sci-fi and sci-fi with political or social content. But, just out of curiosity, I will occasionally dredge through the sludge at the library The last time I was there, the Bova novel was the only new sci-fi book that seemed remotely readable.

    There are other problems with “New Earth” that I didn’t mention in the review, the most obvious if a bit nit picky being that Bova doesn’t understand what determines optical resolution of telescopes (assuming perfect optics, it’s the diameter of the objective lens or mirror)–he has one of his characters explain the small size of the New Earth observatory telescopes by saying, “These telescopes are electronically boosted. They can see more clearly than your best telescopes on Earth.” (p. 295)

    This is almost exactly analogous to saying that the “digital zoom” feature on cheap digital cameras of years past actually worked. (In reality, they cropped the image and blew up a portion of it at lower resolution–you can’t create pixels out of nothing.) The author should have known better than this, and any scientifically literate editor should have caught it. It should never have made it into the book.

    –Zeke

    Like

    • Joachim Boaz says:

      Yeah, that type of SF certainly doesn’t appeal to me ;) Much more interested in literary visions, social ruminations, experimental prose…

      I haven’t read this Bova novel so I can’t really complain about specifics. Nor do I think little science details are the real indicators of the extent of Bova’s problems ;) His characters are stale, his worlds dull, his visions uninspired… There is no wonder in the early novels of his I’ve read — As on a Darkling Plain (1972), The Dueling Machine (1969, and Star Watchman (1964)…

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s